Sport

Ronaldo punishment not scarcely oppressive enough

  |  

Cristiano Ronaldo positively enjoyed an eventful initial El Clasico of a deteriorate on Sunday evening.



On as a second-half substitute, a Portuguese luminary initial scored a overwhelming idea to put Real Madrid behind ahead, before being requisitioned for imitating Lionel Messi’s famous shirt-off jubilee from final year.

Then only mins later, he was handed a second yellow label for make-believe after going down in a box underneath a plea of Barca’s Samuel Ntiti.

Yes, a engagement was harsh, though what Ronaldo did subsequent in pulling arbitrate Ricardo de Burgos Bengoetxea in a behind as he stormed off a representation was simply inexcusable.

No matter how soothing or improper one thinks a preference is, football players, no matter who they are, simply can't start manhandling review officials.

It is opposite a manners of a game, implicitly wrong, and some-more importantly it sends a wrong summary to people watching, generally a immature and impressionable.

Ronaldo is a purpose indication for millions of immature football fans around a world, and if they see their favourite bullying officials and removing divided with it afterwards what will they do subsequent time a preference goes opposite them while personification a pleasing game?

Real Madrid have pronounced they will interest his five-match anathema (1 for a red, 4 for a push), though they should not, and if law be told they should be grateful Ronaldo got off so lightly.

Let’s review Ronaldo’s corruption with a integrate of past incidents.

JDT screw Farizal Marlias was recently criminialized for 12 months, cut to 8 months on appeal, by a AFC after he pushed review officials following a argumentative preference in a essential review behind in May.

Then in 1998, Sheffield Wednesday’s Paolo di Canio was criminialized for pulling a arbitrate over after he perceived a red label in a Premier League match.

While Fazli’s practical attack was honourable of intensely oppressive punishment, Di Canio’s pull was not most worse than Ronaldo’s (although a finish outcome was vastly different) and nonetheless he was subsequently criminialized for 11 matches.

Maybe if Ronaldo didn’t already have a well-earned repute for make-believe over a years afterwards he wouldn’t have been sent off in a initial place, though that is beside a point.

The actor himself has positively grown over a years and is not as conceited as he once was, though this was a lapse to a bad aged days of Ronaldo and a Spanish football authorities should come down on him hard, and hang to their guns as distant as his punishment is concerned. Maybe they should even boost it on interest as a warning.

Besides, Ronaldo has enjoyed some-more than his satisfactory share of enlightened diagnosis in a chastisement area from officials over a years, so in this instance he should male adult and accept a punishment.

The John Dykes Show each Monday, Wednesday Friday @ 8:30 PM HKT

Comments

Article source: http://www.foxsportsasia.com/news/ronaldo-punishment-not-nearly-harsh-enough

Related posts

ေဖေဖာ္၀ါရီ မွ ျပန္လည္ပြဲထြက္ႏိုင္မယ့္ အယ္လ္ဒါ၀ီရယ္

Times of News

Arsenal aim Norwich City scalp

Times of News

What to demeanour out for on Day Eight of a Australian Open

Times of News